> CRT is simply a means to an end, and the end is NOT improved race relations—the end is socialism: “
No, socialism is a positive value. CRT Leftism is egalitarian nihilism, total, bizarrely unequal equality w/o any positive value. Eg, Pol Pot murdered eyeglass wearers. See Brook and Schwartz.
Socialism is not a positive value. Socialism is the pipe dream of the sheep that follow the tyrant. Utopia is unachievable because human nature isn’t perfect.
Within the socialist context, socialists value socialism. To them its a positive value. But egalitarianism is not a value but an attack on values. Its not even a utopia but an attack on every inequality. They dont want equality as a positive. They want all inequalities to be destroyed, not for a valued culture, but for destruction itself. Destruction for the sake of destruction. Thus, eg, modern "art", an attack on art itself. Environmentalism, not for wild nature as a positive value, but to sacrifice man to wild nature, w/sacrifice as end in itself. This attack on values as values is difficult for Americans to accept as a perspective because its consistently evil w/not even a perverse good as alternative. Recall the Portland mayor who _explicitly_ wanted to defund the police, not for a better society, not to end racism, but so the rich would suffer the lack of police to protect them.
Multicultural Nihilism-Peter Schwartz, in Return To The Primitive-Ayn Rand
> IMAGINE A WORLD WHERE PARENTS CONTROLLED 100% OF WHAT WAS TAUGHT IN THEIR KIDS’ SCHOOLS AND BY WHOM.
They already do but colllectively ,by voting. In capitalism, parents as individual parents, control. Besides, as we all intuit, the philosopher-kings know all.
> CRT is simply a means to an end, and the end is NOT improved race relations—the end is socialism: “
No, socialism is a positive value. CRT Leftism is egalitarian nihilism, total, bizarrely unequal equality w/o any positive value. Eg, Pol Pot murdered eyeglass wearers. See Brook and Schwartz.
Socialism is not a positive value. Socialism is the pipe dream of the sheep that follow the tyrant. Utopia is unachievable because human nature isn’t perfect.
Within the socialist context, socialists value socialism. To them its a positive value. But egalitarianism is not a value but an attack on values. Its not even a utopia but an attack on every inequality. They dont want equality as a positive. They want all inequalities to be destroyed, not for a valued culture, but for destruction itself. Destruction for the sake of destruction. Thus, eg, modern "art", an attack on art itself. Environmentalism, not for wild nature as a positive value, but to sacrifice man to wild nature, w/sacrifice as end in itself. This attack on values as values is difficult for Americans to accept as a perspective because its consistently evil w/not even a perverse good as alternative. Recall the Portland mayor who _explicitly_ wanted to defund the police, not for a better society, not to end racism, but so the rich would suffer the lack of police to protect them.
Multicultural Nihilism-Peter Schwartz, in Return To The Primitive-Ayn Rand
> IMAGINE A WORLD WHERE PARENTS CONTROLLED 100% OF WHAT WAS TAUGHT IN THEIR KIDS’ SCHOOLS AND BY WHOM.
They already do but colllectively ,by voting. In capitalism, parents as individual parents, control. Besides, as we all intuit, the philosopher-kings know all.
I enjoy spamming your substacks to both those who are receptive and those who are irritated. Thank you.